Use case — M&A + vendor due diligence
Know what you're inheriting before the systems connect.
Exploit Shield scores every vendor you depend on from real leak incidents, and can run against an acquisition target's footprint before integration begins.
Book a DemoWho this is for
How it works
A grade built from incidents, not a questionnaire.
Add a vendor from a catalog or a CSV, and approve it to bring it into active monitoring. Each vendor gets a scorecard: a letter grade built from real leak incidents tied to their footprint, not a self-reported questionnaire that goes stale the day it's signed.
You mark which vendors are critical to your operations. A confirmed, high-severity incident deducts more from a vendor's grade than a lower-confidence one, so the score moves with what's actually been found, not with what's been claimed.
Ahead of an acquisition or a new integration, running Exploit Shield against the target company's domains and identifiers surfaces what's already exposed before anything gets connected to your production environment, not after the deal closes and the liability is already yours.
01
Add & approve
Load vendor domains and identifiers from a catalog or CSV; approval puts a vendor into active monitoring.
02
Grade
Each vendor's scorecard reflects real leak incidents, weighted by severity and attribution confidence.
03
Prioritize
Mark critical vendors, open the incidents behind a grade, and decide what needs remediation before you're exposed to it.
The portfolio
Every vendor, scored and ranked, at a glance.
Grades move with the evidence: confirmed, high-severity incidents pull a score down further than a lower-confidence finding. Weak vendors surface immediately.
How Exploit Shield helps
Diligence that doesn't stop once the deal is signed.
One footprint, not just your own
Vendor and target-company domains are monitored the same way your own environment is, so exposure that starts with them still reaches you.
A grade built from incidents, not a questionnaire
Vendor scorecards are driven by confirmed leak findings, weighted by severity and confidence, not self-attestation.
Due diligence before systems connect
Run Exploit Shield against an acquisition target's footprint before integration begins, so you know what you're inheriting first.
Findings your team can act on
Vendor incidents route into Jira, Splunk, or OpenCTI, so a scorecard drop is a ticket, not just a number.
What we're hearing
The liability you can't see is the one you still inherit
A corporate development team evaluating an acquisition wanted one thing before close: a real answer to what they'd be taking on, not what the target's own security team was willing to disclose in a questionnaire. Running the target's footprint through Exploit Shield turned that into a concrete list, before the deal closed, not after.